Legal Opinion

In re W.M.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 4, 2006No. 05-462Published

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. This interlocutory appeal arises from the family court’s decision to transfer a juvenile marijuana-possession case back to the district court in which charges were originally filed. Because the family court did not have authority to transfer the case prior to a merits hearing, we reverse and remand.

¶ 2. The facts, which are undisputed, may be briefly summarized. When juvenile W.M., age sixteen, arrived at the district court for her arraignment on a domestic assault charge, a sheriff’s deputy searched her bag and found marijuana. W.M. was later arraigned in the district court on a charge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In re J.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. State v. BuelowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. State v. CharbonneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. In re J.T.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API