Legal Opinion

In re NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 16, 1939No. 16562PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

A proper appraisal of the jurisdictional objections raised by Boston and Providence Railroad Corporation (hereinafter referred to as B P) requires a statement of facts which includes a review of certain phases of the proceedings heretofore had in this matter. Such a statement I find accurately set forth in the brief of the Old Colony trustees which I borrow for purposes of this memorandum. It is as follows.

Upon approval ori October 23, 1935 of the petition of the New Haven for reorganization there came into the custody of this Court not only the property owned by the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. New Haven Inclusion CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lamoille Valley Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Eastern Magnesia Talc Company, State of Vermont, Intervenors. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, State of Vermont, Intervenors. State of Vermont v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve, Intervenors. Canadian National Railway Company, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company and Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. In the Matter of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. Lamoille Valley Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. HOLA Community Partners v. SG Blocks, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API