Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 24, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

The plaintiff, a carpenter in the employ of The Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company, brings this action to recover damages for injuries received on October 18, 1934, through the derailment of a gasoline-propelled section car on which he was riding from Schoodic to West Sebois to get material for repairs he was making on railroad property. It was proved and conceded at the trial that the defendant Railroad Company was a nonassenting largé employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and the defenses of contributory negligence of the employee, negligence of a fellow servant and assumption of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Callahan v. Amos D. Bridges Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  3. Gregware v. PoliquinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. Alton Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Doane v. Pine State Volkswagen, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API