Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ozel Conley v. Robert E. Dauer

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 27, 1972No. 71-1011Published

1DissentAldisert, Circuit Judge

I dissent from the denial of the petition for rehearing.

In my view, this court should have remanded the proceedings with a direction to dismiss the complaint because the alleged constitutional deprivation — failure of the state to provide counsel for indigents at preliminary hearings — concerns the assertion by each plaintiff of a federal right which may be vindicated in a defense in a single state criminal proceeding. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S.Ct. 764, 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77, 91…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API