Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Mangos

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Waterloo Mumdpal Court. — O. B. Courtright, Judge. ACTION at law to recover damages by reason of alleged false and fraudulent representations of the defendant, inducing the execution of a written contract of purchase of defendant’s one-half interest in a partnership business by copartner plaintiffs. Jury waived and cause tried to the court. Judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs and defendant appeals.'

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

Plaintiffs and defendant were copartners engaged in the restaurant business at Waterloo, Iowa under the firm name of the Merchants Cafe. On the 28th day of October, 1920 the defendant entered into a written agreement with plaintiffs to sell his undivided one-half interest in said restaurant in consideration of $3,800, and plaintiffs agreed to pay the defendant therefor said sum and to assume and pay all just debts of the business including a chattel mortgage of $1,400 in favor of a Chicago fixture company. A bill of sale was duly executed and plaintiffs have paid to defendant all sums which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McCormack v. MolburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Wallace v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Davis v. Central Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. McKinney v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. Shuttlefield v. NeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scheel v. Superior Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Greenberg v. Alter CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. State Savings Bank v. DealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Reed v. RobilioDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1967
  5. Gibson v. DeuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API