Legal Opinion

Hertz Corporation v. Knickerbocker

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 28, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZNER, District Judge.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (1) and (6), 28 U.S.C.A.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff The Hertz Corporation and its related companies have been in the automobile and truck rental business for many years and that the name “Hertz” has come to be well known in this connection. It is also alleged that the name “Hertz” has come to mean and is understood to mean, throughout the United States, the plaintiffs’ services. Plaintiff Hertz System, Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Hertz Corporation, registered the mark…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walters v. SHARI MUSIC PUBLISHING CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1973
  2. In Re Wella A.G.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Fragrancenet. Com, Inc. v. Fragrancex. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  4. Mota v. Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Fragrancenet.com, Inc. v. Fragrancex.com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API