United States v. Montrose Chemical Corp. of California
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT DECREE
HAUK, Senior District Judge.
In this action Plaintiffs United States and the State of California have filed a Motion for entry of a consent decree entered into by Plaintiffs and PCBs Defendants Potlatch Corporation (“Potlatch”) and Simpson Paper Company (“Simpson”). 1 Pursuant to the decree, Potlatch and Simpson are jointly and severally obligated to pay $12 Million to Plaintiffs over the next 4 years in three equal payments of $4 million — the first payment to be distributed within ten days after entry of the decree. In exchange, the settling…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- United States v. Seymour Recycling Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1982
- United States v. State Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Montrose Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Atlas Minerals and Chemicals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- United States v. Montrose Chemical Corp. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1993
- Nos. 93-55824, 93-55876Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995