Legal Opinion

American Bosch Magneto Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 2, 1934No. Nos. H-516, H-517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The plaintiff! in these eases seeks recovery of excise taxes paid on the sales of electrical appliances and equipment, and parts therefor, including magnetos, magneto fittings, coils, switches, impulse couplings, horns, etc., all of which were manufactured by it and were in some degree suitable for use, and used, on automobiles.

The taxes involved were assessed and collected under the provisions of section 900 (3) of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921 (40 Stat. 1122, 42 Stat. 291), and section 600 (3) of the Revenue Act of 1924 (26 US CA § 881 note). The sales were made, and the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Busse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Drier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  3. Holley Carburetor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API