Paul H. Barrett v. Independent Order of Foresters
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is a diversity action, prosecuted pro se, sounding in fraud and contract. The district court granted summary judgment against plaintiff-appellant, finding that no issue of material fact exists as to the contract claim and that as a matter of law appellant is not entitled to redress. The district judge also dismissed appellant’s fraud allegation for failure to state a claim. Those rulings and several other rulings of the district court are raised as error on appeal. We find no merit to these assignments of error and affirm.
In order for a fraud to be actionable, the representation relied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ely v. Stratoflex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Cole v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Williams v. RubenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
3Cited by31 opinions
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Wimm v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- William Neal Moore v. Charles Balkcom, Warden, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- David D. Daly, M.D., ph.d. v. Charles C. Sprague, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.