Legal Opinion

Spicer v. City of Webster City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Hon. J. K. Whitaker, Judge. Action for damages. From a judgment against it, the city appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, O. J.

While walking over a sidewalk of defendant city, plaintiff was tripped by a loose plank, and fell. In its charge, and by special interrogatory, the court submitted to the jury whether the defendant had actual notice of the defect in the walk prior to the accident. The *562interrogatory was answered in the affirmative. Appellant now insists that the answer is without support in the evidence. If this be conceded, appellant cannot complain, for it requested an instruction, proper in form, which was fairly embodied in the seventh and fourteenth paragraphs given, submitting this precise…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Town of AckleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Purcell v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Campbell v. OrmsbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Baldwin v. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Smith v. Sioux City & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hanley v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Carnego v. Crescent Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Geddes v. McElroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Seevers v. Cleveland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Miller v. Harrison CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API