Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 9, 2005No. 01-1510PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

397 F.3d 925

David E. RIDENOUR; Jeffrey B. Peters; Mark Graf, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

United States of America, ex rel., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

KAISER-HILL COMPANY, L.L.C., and Statutory Agent: Corporation Services Company; Wackenhut Services Limited Liability Company, and Statutory Agent: James A. Dierker; EG & G Rocky Flats, Inc., and Statutory Agent: C.T. Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1510.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

February 9, 2005.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Wilbert Benjamin Markovits of Markovits and Greiwe Co., L.P.A., Cincinnati, OH,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API