Sears v. Fontaine
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CIACCIO, Judge.
Plaintiff filed a petition for in rem judgment to which defendant filed an exception of no right of action and an exception of no cause of action. The. district court sustained both exceptions and dismissed plaintiff’s suit at its cost. We reverse.
Plaintiff’s petition alleges that plaintiff sold defendant a television, a bed frame, a mattress, and a box spring, that defendant has not paid the whole price of the sale, and that plaintiff claims a vendor’s privilege on the merchandise alleged to be in defendant’s possession.
The peremptory exception of no cause of action challenges…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Gibson v. BurnsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Steadman v. SladovichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- WT Grant Company v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.