Legal Opinion

State v. Crystal Lake Cemetery Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1923No. 23,279PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In a proceeding to enforce taxes and assessments for local improvements against land of respondent, platted and dedicated as a cemetery, the court held the property exempt. Judgment was entered accordingly, and tbe state appeals.

The respondent was incorporated in 1902, under the provision-of title 2, chapter 34, Statutes of 1894, its sole business to be the acquisition and holding of lands to be used exclusively for cemeteries, and the procuring and operating of a crematory. The capital stock has since been increased, so that it is now $500,000, of which shares of the par value of $493,000…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. State v. Duluth Board of TradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Garden Cemetery Corp. v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Wolford v. Crystal Lake Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. State ex rel. Oakland Cemetery Ass'n v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tax Exemption of Sunset Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. RitschelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Hollywood Cemetery Assn. v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. BrowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. State v. Roselawn Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API