Legal Opinion
NAMA Holdings, LLC v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 28, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
We start with the necessary observation that defendants’ arguments are, in the main, frivolous. “ ‘An appellate court’s resolution of an issue on a prior appeal constitutes the law of the case and is binding on the Supreme Court, as well as the appellate court . . . [and] operates to foreclose re-examination of [the] question absent a showing of subsequent evidence or change of law’ ” (Kenney v City of New York, 74 AD3d 630, 630-631 [2010] [citations omitted]). In our order entered September 7, 2010, we held “that the determinations of the arbitration support, more than preclude, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kenney v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- NAMA Holdings, LLC v. Greenberg Traurig, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pierre v. Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Teshabaeva v. Family Home Care Servs. of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- BDC Fin. LLC v. Barclays Bank PLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Fortress Credit Corp. v. Ruskin Moscou Faltischek P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rodriguez v. 2526 Valentine LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.