Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Neely

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1939No. Appeal, 195PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendant was convicted on two indictments, one drawn under the first and the other under the fifth section of the Act of April 24, 1931, P. L. 52 charging him with pandering, within the definition of the act, and with transporting a female for the purpose of prostitution. The verdict on the charge of pandering was set aside and defendant discharged;' the court en banc refused to arrest the judgment or to grant a new trial on the charge under the fifth section and from the sentence imposed, the defendant has appealed.

The following are the admitted facts essential to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FideliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Commonwealth v. ZampognaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. SpalloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API