Legal Opinion

Hieger v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1987No. 51018PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Appellant (driver) was found by a preponderance of the evidence to have been driving a motor vehicle while his blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was .13 percent or *492more by weight, contrary to § 302.505, RSMo 1986. We affirm.

The question is whether the State made a submissible case of proving driver had a BAC of .13 percent or more by weight at the time he was driving, when the evidence was he had a BAC of .14 percent by weight one hour and twenty minutes after he was arrested.

The parties stipulated that there was probable cause to arrest driver for driving while intoxicated and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Arth v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. EnglishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Verdoorn v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Green v. Director of Revenue State of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Cain v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Clark v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Walker v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API