Legal Opinion

Ariemma v. Perlow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1996No. A96A1199, A96A1200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

David Perlow, M.D. performed a vasectomy on John Ariemma, after which Ariemma experienced chronic testicular pain. Ariemma sued Perlow for negligence, fraud, battery, and violations of Georgia’s Fair Business Practices Act. Ariemma’s wife sued Perlow for loss of consortium. Perlow moved for summary judgment on the ground that Ariemma’s written request for the vasectomy exempted Perlow from liability under OCGA § 31-20-5. The trial court granted Perlow’s motion in two separate orders, and in these two appeals the Ariemmas challenge those orders. For reasons which follow, we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Butler v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Robinson v. ParrishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Gowen v. CadyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Dohn v. LovellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re WhittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. In Re: Clay Whittle, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API