Legal Opinion
United States v. King
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 21, 1991No. Magistrate 91-0008APublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JEROME B. SIMANDLE, United States Magistrate Judge:
The United States has charged that defendant Charles King committed a petty offense within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States by engaging in a course of alarming conduct intending to seriously annoy or alarm his victim in disregard of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(c), in violation of the Assimilated Crimes Act at 18 U.S.C. § 13(a).
At trial, the defendant moved to dismiss for lack of federal criminal jurisdiction, alleging that the incident did not occur, as 18 U.S.C. § 13(a) requires, within a place “reserved or acquired [by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- United States v. Alfred ErdosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. SewardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. J. W. Johnson, Adolphus Foston and Harry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. GrantDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2004