Legal Opinion

Higgins v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 4, 1942No. 4256PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The prosecuting attorney filed the following information, the formal parts of which are omitted:

“I, Boyd Tackett, prosecuting attorney within and for the Ninth Judicial Circuit of the State of Arkansas of which Pike county is a part, in the name and by the authority of the State of Arkansas, on oath, accuse the defendant, Jim Higgins, of the crime of assault with intent to kill committed as follows, to-wit: The said defendant on the 3d day of July, 1941, in Pike county, Arkansas, did unlawfully, willfully, knowingly and feloniously and with.malice aforethought make an assault in and upon one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Walls and Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. West v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Bourne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Murchison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Eddington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  5. Wootton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API