Vandenbergh & Hitch, Inc. v. Buckingham Apartment Corp.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
The plaintiffs in error were real estate brokers and’, brought this action to recover commissions for the sale-of the Buckingham apartments. There was a verdict, for the plaintiffs for $4,300.00 which the trial court set. aside and entered judgment for the defendant. The-sole ground on which the trial judge set aside the verdict was because he was “unable to find evidence* sufficient to support the verdict.”
*400The subject of sale was an apartment bouse, then recently constructed and largely occupied by tenants. At the time of the sale the rental contracts called for $1,660.00 per month, or…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Meade v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
- Flannagan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Tabb v. WillisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Saunders v. TempleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Braswell v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.