Legal Opinion

Murray v. Houston Car Wheel & Machine Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1920No. 109-2954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSadler, P. J.

We will refer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the district court against the Houston Car Wheel & Machine Company, from which an appeal was perfected by defendant..

The Court of Civil Appeals first affirmed the judgment, holding that the evidence amply sustained the findings of the jury as to the violation of a nondelegable duty of the defendant in failure to warn plaintiff of the danger resulting in the injury, On rehearing, Judge Walthall dissenting, it set aside its former judgment, holding that Brown was not a vice principal as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tweed v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Tweed v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Mo. Pac. R'y Co. v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. M. P. R'y Co. v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Houston Car Wheel & MacHine Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API