Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Lawrence

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 27, 2011No. 2D10-3361PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Judge.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals the final order denying its motion for new trial following a jury verdict in favor of State Farm’s insureds, Melanie and Carl Lawrence, on their claim for uninsured motorist benefits. State Farm sought a new trial or, in the alternative, juror interviews based on the alleged failure of three jurors to disclose their personal automobile insurance claims histories during voir dire. State Farm argued that Insurance Services Organization (ISO) claims history reports on the three jurors and a supporting affidavit by the State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Loftin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. MalerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Pearcy v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Farneth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Sterling v. FeldbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pembroke Lakes Mall Ltd. v. McGruderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Spector v. SpectorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Borroto v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. E Coast Investments, LLC v. James DeliaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  5. Morgan v. MiltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API