Legal Opinion

People v. Whysong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for review his contention on appeal that the court erroneously admitted into evidence defendant’s statement that he wanted a lawyer. In any event, admission of that statement did not penalize defendant for asserting his constitutional right to counsel by creating an inference of guilt (cfi, People v Al-Kanani, 26 NY2d 473, 478), because defendant’s request for a lawyer was not for the purpose of defending himself from an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ArmlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. Al-KananiNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. LuisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. VegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API