Patterson v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
In Parsley v. Nicholson, 65 N. C., 207, it is said: “The ■object of pleading, both in the old and new systems, is to produce proper .issues of law or of fact, so that justice may be administered between ■parties litigant, with regularity and certainty.” Pleadings serve to con:fine the controversy between the parties to some issue relating to a justiciable cause, so that the field of investigation may be defined and brought within reasonable limits. A party to an action is entitled as a matter of right to put into his pleading a concise statement of the facts constituting his cause of action…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Sunflower Lumber Co. v. Turner Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Banks v. McCosker & MolloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- State v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Lloyd v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Champs Convenience Stores, Inc. v. United Chemical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Hiram Ricker & Sons v. Students International Meditation SocietySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Welles v. RevercombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Smith v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.