Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 22, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

In Parsley v. Nicholson, 65 N. C., 207, it is said: “The ■object of pleading, both in the old and new systems, is to produce proper .issues of law or of fact, so that justice may be administered between ■parties litigant, with regularity and certainty.” Pleadings serve to con:fine the controversy between the parties to some issue relating to a justiciable cause, so that the field of investigation may be defined and brought within reasonable limits. A party to an action is entitled as a matter of right to put into his pleading a concise statement of the facts constituting his cause of action…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Sunflower Lumber Co. v. Turner Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Banks v. McCosker & MolloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  4. State v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Lloyd v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Champs Convenience Stores, Inc. v. United Chemical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Hiram Ricker & Sons v. Students International Meditation SocietySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  3. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Welles v. RevercombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. Smith v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API