Legal Opinion

Schuyler v. Hanna

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1890PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

The plaintiff brought an action in partition in the district court of Richardson county. A decree was entered therein on the 18th day of June, 1888, and the plaintiff appeals. A transcript of the proceedings, containing the pleadings and decree, was filed in this court December 17, 1888. The defendant Lorinda Hanna now moves to dismiss the appeal on two grounds:

First —Because the transcript does not contain the testimony taken on the trial.

Second — That no notice of appeal was issued herein until November 8, 1889.

It is contended that this court has no jurisdiction, because the transcript does…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. SaxonNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Nebraska & Colorado Railroad v. StorerNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Archer v. JacobsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Omaha Loan & Trust Co. v. AyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Burke v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Prucka v. Eastern Sarpy Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State ex rel. Brazda v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API