Legal Opinion

Fortier v. Zimpel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Buchanan, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court (Slidell, J. recusing himself on account of relationship,) was pronounced by

Rost, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment sustaining the opposition of John Slidell in a monitory proceeding. The material facts of the case are as follows: The plaintiff sold a tract of land to the defendant, Zimpd, for one hundred and thirty thousand dollars — twenty thousand dollars cash, and the balance in fourteen notes, endorsed by the opponent and others, each note having but one endorser. Those notes bore interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from maturity till paid,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GilfoilSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Vinton Oil & Sulphur Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  3. Bennett v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. Alfred Hiller Co. v. Hotel Grunewald Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API