Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Gass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 14, 1990No. CV87-727; CA A50168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Co. (Enumclaw) brought this declaratory judgment action to determine whether it had a duty to defend a claim or pay the resulting judgment against its insureds, Howard and Margaret Gass, under a Farmers’ Comprehensive Personal Liability policy. The Gasses counterclaimed against Enumclaw for $10,000 in expenses incurred in defending the claim and $9,000 paid to satisfy the judgment. The trial court found that Enumclaw had no duty to defend or pay. We reverse.

The insurance policy provides that Enumclaw

“will pay on behalf of the insured, all sums which the insured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Heider v. Commercial Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Charter Oak Fire Insurance v. Interstate Mechanical, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  2. Delta Sand & Gravel Co. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. McLeod v. Tecorp International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Northwest Pump & Equipment Co. v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Ledford v. GutoskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API