Legal Opinion
Driver v. Hice
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided January 15, 1993No. 2910465PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In May 1991 Celeste Hice filed suit against Michelle Driver, seeking to recover money damages for the alleged conversion of personal property belonging to Hice. After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court entered a judgment for Hice and ordered Driver to pay damages in the amount of $8,325. Driver, who proceeds pro se, appeals. We affirm.
The substance of Driver's argument in her brief as to several assignments of error is that the trial court's judgment was contrary to the evidence and the law. We shall consider them as one issue.
It is well settled that in order for there to be a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Raley v. Citibanc of Alabama/AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Carolina Casualty Insurance Company v. TisdaleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Russell-Vaughn Ford, Inc. v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- McCain v. P.A. Partners Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Barnes v. BarnhartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Architectura, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Drennen Land & Timber Co. v. PrivettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Mann v. Bank of TallasseeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- McClellan v. McClellanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.