Legal Opinion

United States v. Kirschenman

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided April 18, 1946No. 4149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

(Acting under assignment to the District of South Dakota).

*154Defendant waived a trial by jury in writing and the matter was tried to the Court. He contends that his classification in IV-E by the Board of Appeals of South Dakota was arbitrary and capricious, and that he should have been entitled to an agricultural deferment and classified as IIC. He asserts, therefore, that his induction order was wholly invalid. He admits that he knowingly and wilfully refused to report for work of national importance on June 3, 1945, in pursuance of the order of the local board of May…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Goff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  3. United States v. RinkoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  4. Van Bibber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  5. United States Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Commanding Officer of McCook Army Air FieldDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. SutterDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API