Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Barker

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1897Published

Certiorari to review assessment upon the property of the relator.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

The relator insists that the commissioners in the process of assessing its capital for purposes of taxation had no legal right to include the value of its real estate at any other sum than its assessed value, or, in other words, to consider the real estate at all as a factor entering into an assessment under chapter 456 of *189the Laws of 1857, which regulates the manner of making such assessments. I dissent from this view for the reasons which I have given in the case of People ex rel. New York Clearing House Building Co. v. Barker, post page, 192, and which it is unnecessary here to repeat. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of SwiftNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Hoyt v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. People Ex Rel. Union Trust Co. v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. People Ex Rel. the Panama Railroad v. Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. People ex rel. Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of Taxes & AssessmentsNew York Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API