Legal Opinion

Bledsoe v. Hood

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1934No. Civil No. 3468PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order vacating a judgment and decree and also a sale thereunder in a proceeding to compel the partition of the S. E. 14 of the N. W. the S. W. % of the N. E. tiie N. W. % of the S. E. %, and the N. E. % of the S. W. 14, of section 9, township 23 south, range 20 east of the Gila and Salt River base and meridian, containing 160 acres.

The action was brought by N. C. Bledsoe and Harriet Bledsoe, his wife, owners and claimants of an undivided one-half interest in said premises, to compel a partition thereof between them and the other owners and claimants of such lands, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Crumrine v. CrumrineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Porter v. WingertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Russell v. KoenneckeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawson v. RidgewayArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cuprite Mine Partners v. John AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Register v. ColemanArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Doan v. DoanOregon Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API