Legal Opinion

United States v. Barry-Scott

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 25, 2007No. 05-4464UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN, District Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Shauna Barry-Scott challenges the constitutionality of her conviction on the grounds that she was denied her rights of confrontation and compulsory process under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. She also argues that the judge who issued the search warrant for her residence was not neutral and detached so that the search conducted pursuant thereto was unconstitutional and the evidence found during the search should have been excluded. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I

For the sake of clarity, a brief…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Miller v. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Miller v. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Corion Leshon Moore v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
  5. Hightower v. DixonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API