Legal Opinion

In re Bingham

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided May 30, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge,

At the time of the filing of the petition the bankrupt owed James E. Hartshorn §5110.50, Hartshorn owed the bankrupt $554.70, and both were holden on a note of $1,200 to a savings bank, one-half of which each ought to pay. The bank has proved its claim, and Hartshorn has taken up the note. One-half of what he paid was his own debt, and he can have no claim against the bankrupt estate growing out of that. He insists that the balance of direct claims between him and the bankrupt should be set off against what he has paid that the bankrupt ought to have paid, and that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. SawyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Roth & AppelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  2. Swarts v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Swarts v. SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. Board of Com'rs v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  5. In Re HowellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API