Wood v. Wood
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
The Chancery Court granted Dr. Wood an absolute divorce; and Mrs. Wood in prosecuting this appeal lists two points:
I. Trial Court Erred by Denying Appellant the Eight to Participate in the Trial.
II. There Was No Corroborative Testimony or Evidence Submitted to Sustain the Decree.
The correctness of appellant’s position on the second point is so clearly determinative of the appeal that we discuss the second point at the outset.
A. Lack of Corroboration. Dr. Wood sought au absolute divorce on the claim that he and his wife had lived separate and apart for three…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Sisk v. SiskSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Shelton v. SheltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Gabler v. GablerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Cole v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961