Legal Opinion

Long v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 2017No. 16-CF-730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge:

This ease stems from the government’s prosecution of appellant Mark Long for his alleged role in a conspiracy to hide excessive campaign contributions to a mayoral campaign during the 2010 District of Columbia mayoral election. Appellant pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia’s Office of Campaign Finance (“OCF”), in violation of D.C. Code § 22-1805a(a)(l) (2013 Supp.). On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his pre-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. John F. Gardiner (05-1247) Ronald Lupo (05-1248)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. Henry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. Castillo-Campos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API