Clarence v. Schaffer and Katherine Schaffer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This case was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;
And it appearing that the only material factual issue presented by the pleadings is whether the First Baneredit Corporation, from whom the appellee United States acquired the negotiable promissory note herein sued on, acquired the note from the payee before maturity so as to make it a holder in due course not subject to the defenses alleged in appellants’ answer; Schaffer v. United States, 6 Cir., 216 F.2d 330;
And appellee having filed in support of its motion for summary judgment the affidavit of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Zampos v. United States Smelting, Refining and Mining Co. Anderson v. United States Smelting, Refining and Mining CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Appolonio v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Clarence v. Schaffer and Katherine Schaffer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jack G. Williams v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, and Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Melva Cox, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel Robert Cox, Deceased v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, and Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Violet Richardson, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Ray Walter, Deceased v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, and Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Williams v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962