Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 3, 1988No. Record No. 1251-86-2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

— A furloughed prisoner who fails to return to prison at the appointed time may be guilty of a felony or a misdemeanor. 1 In the trial of Emerson Lambert, who failed to return to prison after his furlough, the trial judge ruled that Code § 53.1- 37(D) creates a presumption that the prisoner has committed a felony when he or she fails to return at the appointed time.

Lambert, an inmate at Pocahontas Correctional Facility, was granted a furlough permitting him to leave at 8:00 a.m. on December 24, 1985. He was required to return no later than 6:00 p.m. on December 27, 1985.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lynch v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. United States v. Phillip CogginsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Andy Chavez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  2. Ellis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  3. Correll v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  4. Hunter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  5. State v. RosaireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API