Lambert v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLEMAN, J.
— A furloughed prisoner who fails to return to prison at the appointed time may be guilty of a felony or a misdemeanor. 1 In the trial of Emerson Lambert, who failed to return to prison after his furlough, the trial judge ruled that Code § 53.1- 37(D) creates a presumption that the prisoner has committed a felony when he or she fails to return at the appointed time.
Lambert, an inmate at Pocahontas Correctional Facility, was granted a furlough permitting him to leave at 8:00 a.m. on December 24, 1985. He was required to return no later than 6:00 p.m. on December 27, 1985.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lynch v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- United States v. Phillip CogginsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by12 opinions
- Andy Chavez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- Ellis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Correll v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Hunter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- State v. RosaireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.