Legal Opinion

State v. SKURLOCK

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2011No. 36818PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Robert W. Skurloek appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

*405i.

Factual and Procedural Background

At approximately 6:00 or 6:01 p.m. on February 27, 2009, the Sandpoint Police Department conducted a search of the motel room where Robert W. Skurlock was residing. The search was conducted pursuant to a “daytime” search warrant. Based on evidence obtained during the search, Skurlock was charged with possession of marijuana with intent to deliver.

Skurlock subsequently filed a motion to suppress, arguing that the search was illegal because the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LindnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. DiazIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. LewisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Leotis B. Branigh, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. HuntleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. RileyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. SKURLOCKIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. Victor Garcia-RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API