Legal Opinion
Randol Nichols v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1986No. 85-2234PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is thereby submitted without oral argument.
In this action under the Federal Torts Claim Act, the plaintiff appeals the district court’s judgment granting the government’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We reverse and remand because the government failed to establish the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- TV Communications Network, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- David v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Alexander v. OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.