Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Coulson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 14, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been received through the negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff, a pedestrian on a public way, testified that before starting to cross the street she looked both ways and saw two automo*367biles approaching but distant about three hundred feet; that then she walked to the first fail of the street railway track and there, looking again, saw that the automobiles were distant about seventy-five feet; that on reaching the second rail she looked again and was struck instantly by the automobile of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. FournierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Barrett v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. La Roche v. SingsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Pietz Ex Rel. Pietz v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. McGinn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Stinson v. SobleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Baczek v. DamianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API