Korpa v. Stuyvesant Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
Spaeth, J.:
I agree with the majority that the compulsory non-suit was correctly granted against appellant Mildred Korpa in her cause of action against appellee Stuyvesant Insurance Company. I also agree that the compulsory nonsuit was incorrectly granted against counterclaim appellant Stuyvesant, and that the case should be remanded for further proceedings. Upon remand, however, I would instruct the court below to permit counterclaim appellee Korpa to amend her reply to Stuyvesant’s counterclaim.
Paragraphs 24 and 25 of Stuyvesant’s counterclaim read as follows:
“24. On or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stewart v. HOOKSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Avondale Cut Rate, Inc. v. Associated Excess Underwriters, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Levin v. KapnekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949