Legal Opinion

United States v. Huber

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided February 4, 2003No. C3-00-76PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEBB, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On November 27, 2002, a jury returned a verdict finding defendants Duane Huber; Duane Huber, d/b/a Huber Farms General Partnership; and Huber Farms, Inc. guilty of all charges alleged against them in the Second Superseding Indictment. Following this verdict, the jury also determined that $5,876,970 was subject to forfeiture by Duane Huber.

Before this Court is a motion for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, brought by defendant Duane Huber. 1 (Doc. # 156.) The government resists this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Larry T. TarwaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Willard Dean KirkieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PetersDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API