Legal Opinion
Pincus v. Carlisle
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 18, 1991No. 91-1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
585 So.2d 1172 (1991)
Stanley PINCUS, Petitioner,
v.
The Honorable James T. CARLISLE, and the Honorable John D. Wessel, Judges of the Fifteenth Circuit of the State of Florida, Respondents.
No. 91-1885.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 18, 1991.
John P. Stetson, West Palm Beach, and Laurence A. Greenberg of Lerner and Greenberg, P.A., Hollywood, for petitioner.
Herbert H. Rolnick of Horowitz & Rolnick, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.
2Per curiam
Since the fundamental nature of the plaintiffs' claim against petitioner Stanley Pincus in Count I of the complaint involves rights…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Michael J. Topolos v. Jeffrey Caldewey, an Individual Dba Vintage Image, Robert Titus, Richard Paul Hinkle, an Individual and Does I Through MCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Garrido v. Burger King Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Schachel v. Closet Concepts, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Anthony v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
4Cited by7 opinions
- de la Llana-Castellon v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- STATE, DHRS v. Southpointe PharmacyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Page v. McMullanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Sparta Surf, Inc. v. KordaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Audiotext Communications Network, Inc. v. Smith Winston Oxsalida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.