Legal Opinion
In Re the Complaint of the National Shipping Co. of Saudi Arabia
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 21, 2000No. Civ.A. 2:99CV223PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
This admiralty action arises out of the February 4, 1999, collision between the U.S.S. ARTHUR W. RADFORD and the MTV SAUDI RIYADH. The National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia (“NSCSA”), as owner, and Mideast Ship Management Limited (“Mideast”), as operator, of the vessel filed a complaint for exoneration from or limitation of liability, pursuant to 46 U.S.C.App. § 183(a) (West 1994). The United States and eight personal injury claimants 1 subsequently filed claims against the limitation plaintiffs for damages arising from the collision. The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coryell v. PhippsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Carr v. PMS Fishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crowley Marine Services, Inc. v. Maritrans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Crowley Marine Services Inc. v. Maritrans Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Crowley Marine Services Inc. v. Maritrans Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Matter of Complaint of Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009