Legal Opinion

Evans v. City of Detroit Election Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1968No. Calendar 15, Docket 52,097PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Kavanagh, J.

Plaintiff Robert L. Evans, intervening defendants Arthur J. Koscinski and John R. Murphy, and seven other candidates, including Raymond A. Kosinski and J. J. Murphy, were candidates for office of judge of recorder’s court of the city of Detroit in the August 6, 1968, primary election.

The intervening defendants, Arthur J. Koscinski and John R. Murphy, requested and were granted by the Detroit election commission a ballot designation of “Former Judge of Recorder’s Court” to distinguish them — because of the similarity of their names — from candidates Raymond A. Kosinski and J. J. Murphy.

On July…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sullivan v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Council No 11, Afscme v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Communist Party v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973
  3. Sooy v. GillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Evans v. City of Detroit Election CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API