Legal Opinion

Ekberg v. Greene

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 4, 1978No. C-1386PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hodges

Petitioners Ekberg and Talamantes (plaintiffs) instituted this negligence action to recover damages for injuries sustained in a flash fire which occurred in the restroom of respondent (defendant) Greene’s service station. The jury rendered a verdict for plaintiffs and the trial court entered judgment. The court of appeals reversed, holding that, as a matter of law, defendant’s negligence was not the proximate cause of the plaintiffs’ injuries. Ekberg v. Greene, 39 Colo. App. 455, 571 P.2d 727 (1977).

We granted certiorari and now reverse. We hold that proximate cause is an issue of fact under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mile High Fence Co. v. RadovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. Kiefer Concrete, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Calkins v. AlbiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Taco Bell, Inc. v. LannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Federal Steel & Wire Corp. v. Ruhlin Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Largo Corp. v. CrespinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Lyons v. NasbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Westin Operator, LLC v. GrohSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API