Legal Opinion

(PC) Thomas v. Chenalo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 2, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01185Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALBERT EUGENE THOMAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01185-AWI-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ONLY 13 v. ON COGNIZABLE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM1 14 CAPTAIN CHENALO, C/O GUERRA, C/O SALAS, C/O MEDINA, C/O #1 (Doc. No. 20) 15 THIRD WATCH, C/O FLOREZ AND PROGRAM SGT. PADILLA, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Albert Thomas is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding on his Second…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API