Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1995No. B088802PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J .

After a court trial, appellant was found guilty of petty theft with a prior (Pen. Code, § 666. Statutory references, unless otherwise noted, are to the Penal Code) and an alleged serious felony, a “strike” (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i)), was found true. Appellant was sentenced to a four-year state prison term, less one hundred thirty-nine days’ custody credits.

Appellant contends: (1) only a conviction suffered on or after March 7, 1994, can be a “strike”; (2) the “three strikes” statute is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) section 667, subdivision (c)(5), which limits custody…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. People v. CepedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API