People v. Hamilton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J .
After a court trial, appellant was found guilty of petty theft with a prior (Pen. Code, § 666. Statutory references, unless otherwise noted, are to the Penal Code) and an alleged serious felony, a “strike” (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i)), was found true. Appellant was sentenced to a four-year state prison term, less one hundred thirty-nine days’ custody credits.
Appellant contends: (1) only a conviction suffered on or after March 7, 1994, can be a “strike”; (2) the “three strikes” statute is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) section 667, subdivision (c)(5), which limits custody…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. CepedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996