Coleman Music & Games Co. v. McDaniel
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COWART, Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether, and under what circumstances, one who holds a judgment against the holder of a negotiable note may receive payment of the note by the maker through garnishment.
Garnishment is available to subject any debt due to a judgment debtor by a third person to the claims of the judgment creditor. § 77.01, Fla.Stat. (1979). Since the maker of a negotiable note is liable to satisfy the note, when due, to the holder of the note, the maker should logically be subject to satisfy the note to a judgment creditor of the holder under the authority…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coyle v. Pan American Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Reeves v. Don L. Tullis & AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Huot, Kelly & Co. v. ElySupreme Court of Florida · 1880
- Caballero v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Hollopeter & Post, Inc. v. SaenzSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gieger v. SUN 1ST NAT. BANK OF ORLANDODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- M.D.F., Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Co. (In Re M.D.F., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1984
- Capital Factors, Inc. v. Alba Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007