Legal Opinion

Coleman Music & Games Co. v. McDaniel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 23, 1981No. 81-100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether, and under what circumstances, one who holds a judgment against the holder of a negotiable note may receive payment of the note by the maker through garnishment.

Garnishment is available to subject any debt due to a judgment debtor by a third person to the claims of the judgment creditor. § 77.01, Fla.Stat. (1979). Since the maker of a negotiable note is liable to satisfy the note, when due, to the holder of the note, the maker should logically be subject to satisfy the note to a judgment creditor of the holder under the authority…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coyle v. Pan American Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Reeves v. Don L. Tullis & AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Huot, Kelly & Co. v. ElySupreme Court of Florida · 1880
  4. Caballero v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  5. Hollopeter & Post, Inc. v. SaenzSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gieger v. SUN 1ST NAT. BANK OF ORLANDODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. M.D.F., Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Co. (In Re M.D.F., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1984
  3. Capital Factors, Inc. v. Alba Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API