Legal Opinion

Holmes v. . Seaman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 4, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. The actions were tried together by consent and the evidence is the same in both.

Read the full summary

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 4, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. The actions were tried together by consent and the evidence is the same in both. The first of these actions is brought to recover the sum of $2,500.00, and the second to recover the sum of $6,798.34, which the plaintiff alleges that she was induced to pay to the defendant by wrongful acts and representations on his part and without consideration. In…

1Opinion of the CourtWillard Bartlett, J.

The gratuity fund of the 27ew York Produce Exchange was established pursuant to chapter 36 of the Laws of 1882, which authorized the corporation to make provision for the widows and families of deceased members, and provide for an assessment of such sum as should be fixed in the by-laws of the corporation upon the death of any member, which sum or such proportion thereof as the by-laws might provide, and such proportion of the surplus income of the corporation as the by-laws might provide, might be paid to the widow, children, next of kin or other persons dependent upon said deceased member,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kemp v. New York Produce ExchangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. McCord v. McCordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
  2. Holmes v. SeamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API